GAVIN: All right everybody, welcome back to Way Too Interested. This episode, we're talking with Dani Fernandez and her semi-obsession with wolves. We're now joined by Garrick Dutcher, who is the research and program director at Living with Wolves. Garrick, welcome, thanks for joining us.
GARRICK DUTCHER: Thank you Gavin, hi Dani, nice to see you guys.
GAVIN: Before we jump in, I'm going to let Dani ask a bunch of questions because I know she's got a ton of them, but Garrick, can you kind of tell us your story? Like what's your background and how'd you get into this?
GARRICK: So we've been working with wildlife my entire life, since I was a child, it was a family endeavor. We were filmmakers with National Geographic and eventually Discovery Channel doing documentary films about wildlife. A lot of that in the later years were in the Rocky Mountains and that included beavers and mountain lions and then three films on wolves. So we became really familiar with wolves over those years; we lived with a pack of wolves for six years.
I was also going to college at the time, that was my family, my father, Jim Dutcher, and his wife Jamie, were there all six years. And I was there on and off for about a total of a year or so of that project. Since then, we've moved into conservation work and nonprofit work with Living with Wolves to educate the public about wolves and the threats that they face and dispel the myths that surround them.
GAVIN: Fantastic, all right. Dani, I'm turning you loose, what you got?
DANI: Well I guess I just wanted to go off of the last thing that you just said, some of those myths and misconceptions about wolves. What are the ones that you think that the general public or people that you're constantly like that is not correct, or they just have a misconception of them as a species?
GARRICK: Well there's quite a few, and a lot of them come from ancient folklore and myths and bedtime stories, and certainly we are made to fear wolves from those stories. And while wolves are wild animals and we shouldn't approach them and try to interact with them, feed them, things like that, they're really not presenting any significant danger to people whatsoever.
In the past 120 years — I said whatsoever, I guess there's the rare exception ... in 120 years in North America wolves have killed two people, and those were very wild wolves under very rare circumstances. Captive wolves have had a few other issues, as of hybrid wolves being had as pets. Then again, when it comes to the average 30 people that are killed by dogs in the United States every year, hybrids are very seldom even responsible for any of those, but wild wolves present very little danger to people.
The biggest danger is when rabies gets into an animal and in North America, we have virtually gotten rid of rabies, especially in the canine population of wild canines. So that myth, and not to villainize bears or mountain lions, because they're very important animals in the wilderness as well. But bears have killed about 60 people in the past 20 years in North America. Mountain lions have killed about 10 or 11 in the past 30 years. And again, with the millions of us out there every day, that really is inconsequential, even for the other carnivores and predators that do have a slightly greater impact than wolves. So the myth of the "big bad wolf" in regards to the threat to people is not very warranted.
DANI: Yeah, those are such low numbers. I didn't even realize that it was that low for all of those wild animals, to be honest. The way that you run across those "wild encounters" that they used to do on certain channels, and made it seem like it was happening all the time.
GARRICK: Right, and another myth is that wolves, especially when they were being re-introduced because we had exterminated wolves in the lower 48 during the 19th and even part of the 18th century and into the early part of the 20th century. The idea of bringing them back came with a lot of myths as well, that wolves would destroy our deer and elk herds. And that they would destroy the ranching economy, the ranching industry and would eat all the cows and sheep out there.
And none of that has happened either, even though the recent legislation in some of these states, Montana and Idaho specifically, is suggesting — the legislators are stating — that wolves are destroying ranching and destroying wildlife. But statistics from the USDA defeat that theory and also statistics from Idaho Fish and Game and Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks. The wildlife management agencies also show that we have very healthy deer and elk herds. In fact, in Idaho we're right at about an all-time record high for elk, which is the primary source of food for wolves.
GAVIN: Well I have a question real quick, Garrick, in the 18th and 19th centuries, why were they exterminated? Was it because people hunted them for their pelts, or was it just defending themselves? What was it?
GARRICK: It was a historical belief that ... it was manifest destiny, was the period of moving west and taming the landscape. The idea that there was really no ecological benefit in having something that also eats meat on the landscape. So we were sterilizing the landscape, we were getting rid of any potential threat. It wasn't until after we'd done that, that we began to see the ecological consequences and start to realize that those top-level predators, top-level carnivores have a really important role to play in the ecosystem.
So that's really where reintroduction came from, especially in Yellowstone, they had seen that the rivers and streamside areas had become greatly impacted by over-browsing from elk. So the restoration of wolves has restored a lot of biodiversity to the park, and wolves can have that effect if allowed to exist in significant numbers and have their natural role with their prey species. And that's kind of where the rub is today in these western states.
DANI: Can you talk about them as pack animals, because we were just talking about that term lone wolf, so is that an actual ... I'm so curious. I also heard that when I was, I can't remember where I saw this, but if a wolf is in a pack, it's actually the beta male that's being sent out and not the alpha. I may have this like completely wrong, but I’m just curious about them in a pack, what the hierarchy is. And if there is an actual lone wolf or that’s just a term that we use?
GARRICK: A lone wolf is a temporary situation. Wolves, by nature, are very social and that's one of the really special things about them. In fact, if you have a dog, you probably find your dog to be rather social and all dogs, every breed of dog, is descended from wolves, not from coyotes, not from foxes, not from any other wild canine. We domesticated wolves.
And so wolves, by nature, were very social. They live in packs, they live in families, and they each have an individual personality just like your dog would. And so a lone wolf, what happens is when wolves live in a family — and this might sound familiar — they grow up, they become mature and they start wanting to have their own relationship perhaps to have their own family. Some of them do that, most of them eventually do that, and they'll leave their natal birth family to go find another mate. And so for that period, they're a lone wolf, but they're looking for other wolves, like a pack to join. And it's a good biological function because if you just stayed in your own family, you would have inbreeding and genetic consequences from that.
So wolves disperse, and a lone wolf is called a disperser, and they may disperse thousands of miles. They can really travel broad landscapes, very long distances. We have a wolf right now, and I don't think he's been picked up since sometime in April with his collar, but he had traveled from Oregon all the way down the Sierras of California. Went across the Central Valley, near Fresno, crossed I-5 somewhere, and got into San Luis Obispo county, not too far north of Santa Barbara. He has a GPS collar, so we kind of had a pretty good idea what he was doing. But he was either following a scent trail marked by another wolf, or he was a pioneer that would be making his own scent markings, which would stay there and be detectable for many years by wolves that would follow. That's how wolves find each other and that's how dispersers would come together and create a pack or find another pack as individuals.
DANI: But I'm so curious because in San Luis Obispo, if he met another wolf and decided to mate, that would be a completely different kind, right?
GARRICK: You just touched on something and that's very intuitive of you to realize. It's our desire to label everything, everything needs to have a box to fit in, and that's what taxonomy is, you know, labeling every type of species. And so there's been this long debate about how many subspecies of wolves there are. There was once 20 something or 30 something, and that's been trimmed down to four or five now. And what wolves do is that, yes, they travel very long distances and breed with other wolves. An arctic wolf could breed with a Mexican wolf.
About 800,000 years ago, wolves migrated away from North America to Asia. They kind of disappeared in North America, lived in Asia for a while, then they came back across the various land bridges during the ice ages and came back to North America in three waves. The first wave became the Mexican wolves, and they pushed very far south all the way down to Mexico, New Mexico, Arizona, which is where they live now. And they're very rare, there's only about 170 in the wild.
Then the second wave was the middleman of wolves, which are the gray wolves that we see in much of North America. And the last migration was the Arctic wolf, which is a very white wolf, and these are all subspecies of gray wolves. The Arctic wolf lives in the Arctic, they're mostly white, they're the biggest, and they came the latest. However, they're all capable of breeding together, and at times they will, because they'll travel these great distances.
GAVIN: Can you talk a little about personality Garrick, because growing up with them, was there one in particular that kind of stood out as a personality that you remember? Or give us an example of how a personality can differentiate from other wolves? I think sometimes people think of wolves because they see them in packs and sometimes you'll see them in films or movies and they're just kind of moving in a pack, they often feel like part of a group. Tell us a little bit about how the personalities differ?
GARRICK: Well it's like you and I, it's like our dogs, they differ greatly. Some are more playful, some are stiffer and more rigid in their interactions, others are very caring and protective. It really is how they are predisposed.
You had mentioned alphas and betas, there is some push to not use the hierarchical terminology that has been assigned to wolves. We still find it valuable, and a lot of researchers do, because there is certainly a fluid hierarchy amongst middle-ranking wolves. And then there is always the breeding pair in a pack, and sometimes more than one pair or more than one female will breed, but usually it's just the alpha female. In a study in Idaho, it was 98% of the time that only the breeding pair bred.
Anyhow, the alphas are not dictatorial, they're not necessarily by nature super aggressive, and they don't necessarily assert themselves through force. And it turns out that the alpha female is the most essential to keeping the pack together, more so than the alpha male or the breeding male.
DANI: That sounds about right, I believe that.
GARRICK: Took us a while to figure that out, but yes of course, right?
GAVIN: How big is a pack, like what's an average pack size?
GARRICK: Well, that really depends. Unfortunately here in Idaho with how much we're killing them, it's rare for packs to get above five or six. I'll explain to you why that is not very good for wolf survival. But in Yellowstone right now, the Junction Butte pack is well into the twenties, it might even be bigger than that. An average pack size, if I were to say so in natural conditions is probably around 10 or a dozen, give or take. But it really also depends on the concentration of packs in the area, the territory size and the prey availability, and how much bounty there is for them to be able to you know...
When there is a lot of prey availability, that's when you'll sometimes see more than one litter in a pack. The litters only happen once a year during the spring so that the pups can grow throughout the summer and fall to get to be pretty full-sized in order to survive winter. And 50% or so of pups die in their first year, it's not an easy life.
Hunting, for wolves, is really difficult. They only succeed about 15% of the time, they fail about 85% of the time. That's a broad average. Hunting bison is a lot less of a success rate, I think it's less than 5%. Hunting whitetail deer I think it can be a lot greater of a success rate, I think upwards of 25%. So it really depends on who's hunting what, but 15% of the time success rate is a pretty good average. Also, wolves get killed or injured a lot in the hunt because they have to go in with their teeth, they don't have sharp claws, they don't have the brute force that bears and lions have. And so they have to go in and face kicking hooves and horns, antlers, whatever it might be, you know, formidable defenses of their prey species. They get killed pretty often.
Personalities though, they vary greatly. Some wolves will select themselves to stay back with the pups, to be puppy sitters and play with the pups. They just want to play and kind of be goofy, and that's, again, a predisposed personality, while others will want to go out and hunt. So science has shown that at least four need to be in a hunting party to have the greatest likelihood of success. Under four and it diminishes greatly. So when you have a pack of five or less, if you have four hunters that only leaves one to stay back with the pups, and that would be the bare minimum size for a fairly functional pack. Because otherwise, there's always a pup sitter that gets left behind, or at least if there can be, there always is. And that protects the pups, keeps them near the den or the rendezvous site or wherever they are so that the pack will find them and keeps them protected from any kind of external threat.
DANI: Are they ever petty, or have drama amongst each other?
GARRICK: Oh yeah, absolutely. There are personalities that don't get along with each other, they pick on each other, it's very human in a lot of ways. It's really fascinating. In our pack, the leader seemed to be an alpha male by the name of Kamots, and he was very benevolent and he didn't need to assert himself. Very rarely would he ever do that. And it was sort of just the leadership that he had through the respect of the rest of the pack.
GAVIN: Do the alpha males, or anybody in it, do they show the fact that they are the alpha male in some way, does their body change or are the alpha males bigger generally or is there anything specific about it?
GARRICK: Males are bigger than females, about 20% larger, and they take on different roles in the hunt, seemingly because of that. Or maybe, I don't know which is the chicken or the egg there. But the wolf that was the most subordinate in the Sawtooth Pack was one of the largest. His personality just lent himself to being submissive, so size, no. Interestingly, what we are seeing through research is that in a pack, for instance, and I was talking about the importance of the alpha female, if the alpha male gets up from a rest and everybody's chilling, he just gets up, wolves may take note of that and sit around and hang out. If the alpha female gets up and starts moving, they all get up, they all get ready to move.
DANI: I love that.
GARRICK: She has a stronger influence and they follow her. That seems to be the case in many situations.
DANI: It reminds me of those old royal dinner parties, when the woman stands up and all the men like get up, they're all standing up as she exits.
GARRICK: Yeah, these are important things to realize.
DANI: Yeah, I'm curious in like all of your time, what are the things that you love the most about them, that you're the most passionate about, or just love about wolves?
GARRICK: Most passionate is the unfair way in which they're being treated by state governments and by certain members of the hunting community and by the ranching community. Not all ranchers, there's a lot of ranchers working towards coexistence and doing so very successfully. That might be what I'm most passionate about, because it's simple injustice and wolves deserve better, so do all large carnivores.
GAVIN: Can I dig into that really quick? So I was trying to figure this out earlier. Is the discussion mostly between ranchers and conservationists? Can you kind of lay out what's happening in that world for us so we can best understand?
GARRICK: Wolves rarely attack livestock, but it does happen. In 2020, I'm just going to give you some numbers here, wolves killed 173 sheep and cattle in Idaho, but that is out of two and a half million cattle and 220,000 sheep. So that amounts to them killing one in about every 12,000. And that was out of a population estimated by fish & game to be around 1500 wolves at its peak which is summer, right after pups are born.
But for a livestock producer, maybe zero is a better number than 173 out of 2.72 million, and then it also just creates more work for them. They have to find ways to try to keep their animals safe, but I want to remind you that these are wolves that we all paid for the restoration of through our tax dollars. And they live largely, almost entirely in national forests, which is our public lands owned by you and me and everybody paying our tax dollars.
And so we have a private enterprise of the ranching community leasing those lands to raise their livestock. It is our position that it is their responsibility to keep their animals safe on public lands and to minimize the conflicts and accept some of the natural threats that exist out there. Many more livestock are killed by bad weather, birthing complications, and disease out there on the land than by wolves, mountain lions and bears, but yet we persecute those species.
GAVIN: Do some of the myths that we were talking about before kind of invade this conversation? Do you find that people, when you say I'm here to help make sure that wolves get a fair shake, are they like wolves are bad automatically, like they just come at it with that attitude?
GARRICK: Absolutely. It's a lot of people's ingrained belief that that's the case, I'm faced with it all the time. There was a recent video of a wolf hunting an elk in Yellowstone from last week. And the elk and the wolves are not really thinking about where a line of the traffic of cars is because they're just doing their thing.
So the hunt happens to cross right through the road, the elk runs right into a car, and then the wolf follows and now he's got a meal because the elk looked either unconscious or dead. Some of the people commenting in the news thread said "Too bad it wasn't the wolf, this is another reason to get rid of all the wolves."
I mean, they're just carnivores making a living and they're not that many of them. Yellowstone had 123 at the end of last year. And we have 120,000 elk in Idaho, which is almost at the all-time record high.
Dani, you asked what I like most about wolves, and it’s the diversity of personalities, the compassion they show each other, and the support they show each other within their own family. I think those are probably two things I admire most in them and respect and really resonate with me.
DANI: I still can't handle that comment because before you got on, we were talking about how I saw A Quiet Place 2. I was saying it was so lush and green because we didn't exist anymore. My first thought would be like, too bad humans exist and that car was there. That traffic, that road that shouldn't have been there through their actual land.
The wolves have always been here, and same with all these wildlife animals, we are the ones that are building on their land. They're just trying to survive. I know probably everyone listening to this knows this, but my first instinct was like, did no one say anything about the car being in the middle of this park or something? No, it's the wolf, and that's so hard to hear.
I know you're doing such good work to try to undo, but that must be so difficult to have to look and see those comments of people that are hating on an actual, glorious animal. An animal that's only trying to co-exist along with us, who are dominant and brutal, like we’re the most violent species, clearly.
GARRICK: That's right. We have the greatest impact on the planet and all of its natural systems. So that is something that hopefully the generations that follow mine will continue to become more and more aware of. And more people will hopefully fight for that awareness and to stem the bleeding, so to speak, and protect what we have left of wild places and wildlife because it is critical to our own survival. I mean medicine comes from the jungle from all around, we find our medical solutions through natural compounds, natural chemical reactions. We learn from nature and it helps us survive.
GAVIN: I have kind of a random question, but how long will they live when they have a pack? Are they 30-year animals, 40-year animals, what's the lifespan of a wolf?
GARRICK: Not very long. In the wild, a 12 or 13-year-old wolf would be very old, they're similar to dogs, large dogs.
One of the Sawtooth Pack, he lived his life out in captivity in the large twenty-five-acre enclosure. He made it to 17. So captive wolves, 17, sometimes 18, and that’s really the furthest they make it. In the wild, a lot of them die at 2, 3, 4 or 5, but you know, some will persist and live to 12 or 13.
GAVIN: And do they die mostly from — like you were saying before — accidents, or is it hunger? I'm assuming a lot of them also die at the hands of humans, but what's their main cause of death?
GARRICK: Absolutely, humans, by far. In Idaho last year, out of 1500 wolves, people killed 583 of them. In Yellowstone National park, because this is a sort of contained environment, but limited space with lots of prey, way more prey than was probably there when there was a healthy balance of carnivores and prey species. You know, wolves have since reintroduction and since mountain lions and bears have been allowed to return and numbers as well, the elk population has come back down to a more sustainable natural number. But what we're still seeing in Yellowstone may ease up, because it's not necessarily characteristic of wolves everywhere. There’s a lot of wolf-on-wolf killing, competition for space and resources, but in places like Idaho and Montana, it is far and away people killing wolves, hunting and trapping them. And trapping is a really unfortunate thing.
Just recently in New Mexico, the government there passed a law — called Roxy's Law colloquially — to ban trapping on public land. Arizona had done that years past, California has very strict trapping rules, hardly any trapping allowed at all, same with Colorado. So there's a move away from trapping and that's a great threat to wolves. And the other thing is that when people are out trapping, half the time they're trapping the wrong species because traps are indiscriminate.
Whatever likes the smell of whatever's luring it to the trap is going to step in the trap. So there's a ton of collateral damage in that kind of archaic and outdated practice that we hope someday isn't going to be something we have to face any longer. But it does a lot of damage to wolves and other wildlife.
GAVIN: This is maybe very rare, and if it is, please feel free to say, but if you were ever to come across wolves in — say you're camping and out in the wild — what should we do if we see them? Will they even come up to us?
GARRICK: Very unlikely. There are a few situations where that's occurred. There was a big sensationalized story out of Banff a couple of years ago, and the wolf that came in and actually bit somebody in a sleeping bag, they ended up killing the wolf. They found out that it was a very old wolf, his teeth were all worn down, he was starving, he was at the end of his life and at this point kind of desperate.
He didn't hardly do any damage at all to the person. I mean, he cut his arm, but he didn’t have much of the ability to kill anything at that point. So, no. I hear tons of stories of people camping and encountering wolves, but the thing I would be careful with is your dog. Especially during denning season, wolves will want to protect their pups, and if they feel that somebody's dog is a threat to that, their attention will be on the dog.
So if you're in wolf habitat, it's good to have your dog nearby, not to let it run out very far. Plus, when dogs run really far ahead and away from you, they're often harassing wildlife. Which, life for wildlife is tough enough on its own, let alone us having any kind of negative adverse impact upon them. So I go hiking with my dog and I want him out there and I just keep him nearby.
DANI: I think my final thing I was just going to ask, because I collect so much wolf art and memorabilia, do you do that as well still?
GARRICK: Yeah, absolutely, and a lot of it gets sent to us because of our history with all this. There's still a lot of big fans out there from the films of the Sawtooth Pack. The films are Living with Wolves, Wolves at Our Door and Wolf: Return of a Legend. Those three, I think one is on Hulu, they're available on YouTube, other places, and Discovery still sells DVDs of them and so on. So if you want to learn about the Sawtooth Pack, you can find those but yeah, we get memorabilia all the time. People approach us to co-produce products, we've done all kinds of interesting things.
GAVIN: Do the wolves get fan mail, does a specific wolf get sent fan mail to you guys, for the Sawtooth Pack members.
GARRICK: Yeah, absolutely. And there are people who are very passionate about individuals within the Sawtooth Pack, you know, very much picking their favorites and loving that personality.
GAVIN: Is there any place you can see them? Is there like a camera live-streamed online or anywhere you can kind of observe wolves in a way for people at home?
GARRICK: In captivity, I believe some of the centers, maybe the International Wolf Center in Minnesota, maybe the Wolf Conservation Center in New Salem, New York, I believe? I think they may have live cams for captive wolves. I think the Detroit Zoo had a live cam on their captive pack as well.
But in the wild, no, the very best place to go see wolves is the northern range of Yellowstone, the Lamar valley, and in that area. Depending on the time of year, your chances of seeing wolves if you get up early enough and go for it is probably an excess of 60 to 70% on any given day at the right time of year.
GAVIN: Is there like a wolf tourism world, where people go ...?
GARRICK: Yeah, thanks for bringing that up Gavin, we want to point out always that some of the arguments against wolves is that they're all red ink, well they're actually generating. Back in 2004 or '06, John Duffield a researcher out of either Missoula or Bozeman University of Montana or Montana State (I don't remember which one) did a study that found back then that $35.5 million dollars a year were generated by wolf tourism for local businesses. And we work with people that run tours in the park.
Nathan Varley and Linda Thurston of Wolf Tracker are, in our opinion, the best operators for going into the park and seeing wolves, they've been doing it for a long time. So yeah, there's a lot of enthusiasm for that. That study was done quite a while ago, and park traffic has more than doubled since then. And it seems that there's a disproportionate amount of that traffic being directed at trying to find the large carnivores, mostly wolves, but also grizzly bears. So that number from 35.5 million has probably doubled or more since then.
GAVIN: Well gosh, thanks so much for being here, this was amazing. I have one more question before you go Garrick, I've asked this of all our experts. Is there something that you're specifically way too interested in right now, outside of your wolf interest?
GARRICK: You know, a passion of mine, two things in my life. I love celebrating cultural diversity, visiting different cultures around the world, seeing how they live, interacting with them, learning from them, as a way to kind of step outside of my own.
And I love birds, I love going bird watching because it takes me to some of the most pristine ecosystems in the world. I get way out there in jungles, wherever, savannas, you name it. I choose those passions because they'd bring me to the places that I want to see.
GAVIN: That's awesome. Well Garrick, thank you for coming, and Dani, thank you so much as well.
DANI: Yes, thanks for having me.
GAVIN: This was super fun and I really appreciate you guys coming in. And Garrick, they can go to
livingwithwolves.org to learn more about it, is that right?
GARRICK: That's correct, and you can follow us on
Facebook,
Instagram, and
Twitter as well.
GAVIN: Wonderful. All right, thanks so much for joining me, you two. I appreciate it. We'll be back next time with a new episode.
GARRICK: Thanks guys.
DANI: Thank you.
GAVIN: All right everybody, that was the show for this week. Thank you so much to my guests Dani Fernandez and Garrick Dutcher. Also thanks go to the Gregory Brothers for our theme song.
Thank you to Eric Johnson of
LightningPod for helping to put this thing together. And I really appreciate you tuning in.
Please, if you'd like to, follow me on Twitter
@GavinPurcell. As I've said in the past, I think there might be a Discord now, and we'll find out. I will try to regularly update this. For now, since I'm recording all of these ahead of time and wanting to get them right, I might re-record some intros and outros as we go along.
But we're trying to build a community around this, so enjoy, and please shout at me with any ideas for topics or guests you have, I would love to hear them. Thanks again for listening and tune in next week, we have about five more left in this first run, and I'm really looking forward to hearing your feedback on all of them. Thanks so much. Buh-bye!